Contact Form (#11) (#12)

[audax_checklist]

Result: Brevet 600km Jurkalne 2025

Brevet No: 2025-05
Date: 26.07.2025
Distance: 600km
Category: Brevet
Control Points (CP): CP1 Auce 108km, CP2 Saldus 225km, CP3 Kuldiga DUNA 266km, CP4 Jurkalne 308km, CP5 Sarnate 323km, CP6 Kolka 437km, CP7 Mersrags 501km
Start/finish: Jaunmārupe, Mazcenu aleja

#ParticipantsCityCP1CP2CP3CP4CP5CP6CP7FinishTimeHomologation
1Andrejs PisarenkoJelgava11:4317:5720:4723:1700:1411:38DNF
2Anita DārziņaRīga11:2516:1418:1620:1221:1103:4907:2711:3327:33172749
3Aleksandrs Leo SučkovsRīga14:1921:1200:1502:3303:2313:3917:2723:3039:34172748
4Daiva CemnolonskieneKlaipēda11:2416:1518:1520:1221:0706:5610:1115:1931:19172750
5Didzis BrantsJūrmala11:2616:15DNF
6Edgars VizulisIkšķile11:2315:1217:1018:4619:1823:4602:2205:5521:55172751
7Eduards SevostjanovsRīga11:5716:1618:2320:2120:5802:3505:2409:3225:32172752
8Gatis BerzinsGarupe11:2316:1418:1620:1221:0706:5610:1115:1931:19172753
9Gatis StūrmanisJelgava12:15DNF
10Igors GudzovskisRīga11:2816:1418:1520:1021:2307:3111:3427:34172755
11Ilga BāliņaRīgaDNF
12Kaspars Aide-ĀriņšJūrmala11:2616:1418:2020:3521:1103:4807:2611:3427:34172756
13Niels OjaTallinn12:3618:3421:3523:3900:33DNF
14Nils CērpiņšRīga11:2616:1618:2020:3921:1107:2611:3427:34172760
15Oleksandr PozdniakovMykolaiv13:0318:5522:2700:5104:1110:1714:5520:1636:16172757
16Pēteris PitānsLiepāja11:2316:1018:1420:1021:1102:3505:2309:3325:33172758
17Ruslans SolovjovsJūrmala11:2516:1618:2020:1322:5703:5007:2811:3427:34172759
18Valentinas RyčkovasVilnius11:3818:1520:4723:1602:0011:3715:1920:1036:10172762
19Rolandas SamajauskasVilnius13:0319:5722:4601:1202:1211:0514:5119:5035:50172761
14
Finishers
21:55
Fastest Time
39:34
Longest Time
17:39
Time Spread

Finish Times Distribution

How riders clustered across time brackets

The majority of finishers (45%) completed the 600km route between 25-30 hours. Only one rider finished in under 22 hours.

Checkpoint Timeline

Fastest vs median vs slowest progression

The fastest rider maintained a consistent lead throughout all checkpoints, while the slower riders showed more variation in pace.

Participant Rankings

Rank Name Ride Time ~Avg. Speed Time Gap (hh:mm)

Key Insights

Group Finishes

Several riders finished in tight groups, with 5 riders completing the course in 27:34 and 2 riders in 31:19.

5 at 27:34 2 at 31:19 Group strategy

Women’s Performance

The event featured two strong female finishers who demonstrated exceptional endurance. Showing the strategic benefits of tandem riding in ultra-distance events.

Total 2 women Both placed in top 70%

Time Distribution

The event saw a wide 17h39m range from first to last finisher, with most clustered in the 25-30 hour range.

17h39m spread 45% in 25-30h 1 sub-22h

Completion Rate

With 14 finishers and 4 DNFs, the event had a 78% completion rate, typical for such a challenging distance.

14 finishers 4 DNFs

Event Summary

The 600km brevet featured:

  • 14 determined finishers who conquered the grueling course
  • 4 riders who didn't complete the event (DNF)
  • 78% completion rate, showing strong rider preparation
  • A remarkable 17 hour 39 minute spread from first to last finisher

Edgars Vizulis set the pace with an impressive 21:55 finish time, averaging approximately 27.4 km/h over the 600km distance. The final finisher crossed the line after 39 hours 34 minutes of continuous effort.

Group Dynamics

  • 5 riders formed a tight group finishing in 27:34
  • 2 riders completed the course together in 31:19
  • These group finishes suggest smart collaboration and shared pacing strategies

Women's Performance

  • Anita Darzina (27:33) and Daiva Cemnolonskiene (31:19) represented women finishers
  • Both women finished in the middle of the pack, with Anita just 1 minute ahead of the large 27:34 group
  • Daiva's steady 31:19 performance demonstrated excellent endurance

Time Distribution

  • 36% of finishers (5 riders) clustered in the 27-28 hour range
  • 21% (3 riders) finished between 25-27 hours
  • The distribution shows a long tail with several riders taking 35+ hours

Checkpoint Analysis

  • The fastest rider maintained a consistent lead throughout all checkpoints
  • Middle-pack riders showed remarkably similar timing through CP4 before spreading out
  • The time gaps expanded significantly in the second half of the event

Key Takeaways

  1. Group riding paid off - The large 27:34 group proved the effectiveness of shared pacing
  2. Women were competitive - Both female finishers placed solidly mid-pack
  3. The course got tougher - Time gaps widened in later stages as fatigue set in
  4. Preparation mattered - The high 78% finish rate suggests well-trained participants

Final Thoughts

The Brevet 600km served as a true test of endurance and strategy.

  • Collaborative riding proved effective
  • Women competitors performed strongly
  • The course grew progressively more challenging
  • Proper preparation led to a high completion rate

These insights can help riders prepare for future editions. The tight finishing groups particularly highlight the social and strategic aspects of ultra-distance cycling.

Contact Form (#11)

Leave a Reply